After more than a decade of work, including extensive consultations by the provincial government with violence against women advocates and activists, the Ontario government has proclaimed those sections of Bill 133 that deal with restraining orders. These changes to the law will significantly increase safety for women and children who are fleeing violent situations.
Abused women and their advocates in Ontario have long been frustrated by the restraining order legislation provided under family law. Restraining orders often contain conditions that are difficult to understand, the police are often reluctant to enforce the orders and the consequences to an abuser who has breached a restraining order are frequently minimal. As a result, women and their children do not get the safety they deserve, and abusers are not held accountable for their actions.
Breaches of restraining orders will now lead to charges being laid under the Criminal Code, rather than under the Provincial Offences Act, as was the case before October 15th. A man who breaches a restraining order could be arrested by the police, charged with a criminal offence and held for a criminal bail hearing. His case would then proceed in criminal court and, if he is found guilty, he would be liable to potentially more serious penalties.
Also new as of October 15th is an expansion of who can apply for a restraining order. In the past, the Family Law Act restricted restraining orders to spouses, former spouses or people who have cohabited for at least three years. Now, people who have lived together for any period of time may apply for a restraining order. This will ensure that women, no matter how short-lived their cohabitation arrangement, can have access to the safety of a restraining order.
Restraining orders will now be made "in the form prescribed by the rules of court." In other words, all restraining orders will appear on a standard form order, which will make them more easily understood by women and will simplify enforcement by the police.
To support these changes to the legislation and in recognition of the fact that increasing numbers of women are handling their family law cases without legal representation, the government has produced a plain language guide to restraining orders.
These changes are important because they are the result of a meaningful consultation process between government and women’s advocates.
I think it is safe to say that for those of us who were involved in this very lengthy consultation process, from time to time we had doubts about the outcome. Of course, we did not see everything we wanted incorporated into the new legislation. For example, we lobbied for restraining order legislation to apply to dating as well as common-law relationships, but the government chose not to take this step.
However, the changes that were proclaimed on October 15th are important and substantive and they will have an immediate and positive impact on women’s lives.
Note: Further sections of Bill 133 that amend child custody and access, pension division and child support legislation are expected to be proclaimed over the next several months.
See my submission to the Ontario Standing Committee on Social Policy.
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yay! I am so glad that you have a blog! I have always found your commentary on legal issues that impact women who have experienced violence to be so helpful to me and other anti-violence advocates. Good to find you here Pam.
ReplyDeletemarg
I am so grateful for this change. I was on the phone with an officer from a DV unit recently and he stated that a peace bond is a better way to go than a restraining order as the police don't really know what to do with a restraining order but are very clear on what a peace bond means. Anything that helps victims of violence is a positive step forward. I applaude all the advocates who worked on getting these changes put in place.
ReplyDeleteI am absolutely livid. I always thought our Justice system worked overall...wrong, especially when it comes to Peace Bond trials. Yes, trials. The poor excuse of a human being ex-boyfriend of my daughter refused to sign a Peace Bond after having terrorized her phychologically, stalked her, kicked her and threatned to have both my husband and I beaten up and have someone blow up our car on his behalf. The Crown charged him with a 810 Criminal Harassment and after 5 months a trial date (the low life said he wanted a trial) was set. The date is quickly arriving and we have tried to talk with the Crown to find out what to expect, if our witnesses (yes, we have witnesses and we gave a 32 page folder disclosure the first day we appeared at the Peace Bond hearing) are to be subpeoned, what to expect and have been given the run-around.
ReplyDeleteWe cannot have our lawyer because the case is being brough forth by the Crown and we feel let down and not taken seriously. No wonder so many women lose their battle...Appauling in this day and age! This has given me a thirst for justice beyond my control and I will fight to have the safety of women taken seriously and have this dangerously flawed justice system changed to protect the victims rather than the criminals. I am used to leading and achieving and I will achieve in my quest to bring changes. If you have suggestions I appreciate any that will bring us closer to winning this so very important quest. Thanks. Maria